SHERLOCK HOLMES 3.0*** (almost 3.5***)
The movie opens with Sherlock Holmes (Robert Downey,Jr.) and Dr. John Watson ( Jude Law) apprehending serial killing Satanist Lord Blackwood. Blackwood is subsequently executed by hanging, but then when he seemingly he rises from the dead, the deductive duo must determine whether it's a supernatural occurrence or if there's a logical explanation. It's exactly the type of mystery Sir Arthur Conan Doyle would have devised, with plenty of twists and opportunities for Holmes to show off his genius as he races to stop a plot to take over England and (gasp!) America. Everything from the experiments Holmes performs in his Baker Street flat to his climatic revelation and explanation of the mystery.

Robert Downey Jr. is right at home in the role of the infamous detective. Swapping out futuristic armor for a pipe and fiddle, he plays a character with the same wit and confidence as his Tony Stark character in the excellent movie, “Iron Man.” This makes sense because, to some degree, what is 'Sherlock Holmes' if not merely the Tony Stark character set back about a hundred years? Regardless, Downey Jr. is excellent, providing a wit and charm to his latest role. Jude Law plays his right hand man, Dr. John Watson, in a role much smarter than past incarnations of the Watson character. The two are more equals than hero and sidekick, and their chemistry is marvelous..it really makes the movie..

Even though Sherlock Holmes seems a bit more like James Bond, he doesn't seem any less like Sherlock Holmes. Director Guy Ritchie finds a way to even depict Sherlock's fighting more as a mental exercise than as a physical feat. The film has fun exploring this part of Holmes left untouched by other films….the physical side. Yet Holmes was a boxer, stick/sword fighter, and a martial artist. It was in the books, and it is brought forward in this film as well . Holmes's eccentricities and drug-use are also shown. But, Holmes was never meant to be a symbol of a stiff-upper lip Britain, yet that's what he had become. Now they’re changing that image and maybe that isn’t so bad… but it does take some getting used to, and I have to admit I struggled with this during the movie. But, I have come to understand it better upon reflection.

“Sherlock Holmes” is smart and entertaining, a combination which always works better than either adjective by itself. This is an invigorating re-boot that reminds us why this detective is such an icon. It is an entertaining film for the head and heart. But be prepared for a different type of character…one who combines his brilliant mind with physical prowess to overcome the villains and along the way, at time, appears “spaced out” …brilliance and drugs will do that.

Clark

TWILIGHT 3.5**** ( The 1st of the Meyer books made into a movie (2008)…just saw it on the DVD..the 2nd is now out and I’ll be seeing and reviewing it soon)


Okay, now I know what ALL the fuss is about. I understand. And I liked it a lot. This is a beautiful, lush movie with a beautiful, moving love story. And unless you’ve been stranded on a deserted island for the past 3 years, you will already know that the story has to do with vampires..but, as it turns out, not your traditional vampires… now they still like blood, but can go for different varieties, and they’re still super strong and fast and have that washed out look on their face with the color-changing eyes. As for how they’re different…can’t tell..you need to discover that from the movie.

The story is set in a small town, Fork, in the State of Washington…thus why everything looks so lush from all the rain…also a perfect home for vampires since the sun almost never comes out due to the constant clouds and overcast. The setting is high school where the main characters are juniors. The female lead, Bella (played quite well by Kristen Stewart) moves there to live with her father..her mother has remarried and is on the road a lot because the new hubby is a baseball player. Bella hits it off quite easily and quickly with the other kids and in the process meets a mysterious and dazzlingly beautiful Edward Cullen. ( played quite well by Robert Pattison ) Edward is nothing like any boy she's ever met. He's nothing like anyone she's ever met, period. He's intelligent and witty, and he seems to see straight into her soul Oh, and to no one’s surprise, he’s a vampire. The surprise, however, comes in discovering what kind of vampire he is and how the relationship between Bella and Edward develops and whether it can last.
The movie is directed by Catherine Hardwicke, who also directed the teen films Thirteen, Lords of Dogtown and The Nativity Story. She chose her leads wisely: the pretty Stewart is a questioning, questing presence; the Pattinson, a sensitive-stud dreamboat. And Hardwicke is faithful to the book's chaste eroticism. The couple must put off having sex because, well, it could kill Bella. Yet waiting has its own delicious tension. So, even if Twilight isn't a masterpiece, it sweetly rekindles the warmth of great Hollywood romances, where foreplay was the climax and a kiss was never just a kiss.
So although I am a man and far from 13 years old, and even though I have not read any of the books in the Twilight series, I thoroughly enjoyed this movie and look forward to seeing the sequels. However, my next movie will be “Fight Club” on DVD which I haven’t seen yet…so as to get my testosterone level back up to He-Man levels.

Twilight (120 ) is rated PG-13 for violence and a scene of sensuality.

Clark

TRIVIA NOTES

1.Over 5,000 actors auditioned for the role of Edward.

2 Kristen Stewart turned eighteen while filming the movie and was rewarded with a birthday cake - and a full night of shooting. Kristen Stewart has naturally green eyes. She wears brown contacts for filming to match Bella's eye color.

3. Stephanie Meyer claims these authors partially inspired her: Jane Austen, Orson Scott Card, Shakespeare, and Charlotte Bronte. The author of the books has a Cameo part and can be seen next to a laptop ordering a vegetarian sandwich in the diner at the beginning of the scene where Charlie asks Bella if she likes the boys in town.

4. Robert Pattison performed two songs in the movie, however only one of these songs, "Never Think," appears on the soundtrack. His other song, "Let Me Sign", is a bonus track. He actually plays the piano in the scene where Edward is playing "Bella's Lullaby".As soon as Pattison was cast, he moved to Oregon and began working on his character, both physically and mentally. He worked out five hours a day with a trainer: learning to fight, play baseball, and do stunts. He also had to learn to drive and get an Oregon driver's license.

5.In the movie when Bella and Edward are lying in the meadow, the sun coming through the trees makes a heart between them.

6.. With its $69.6 million opening weekend gross the movie had the biggest opening ever for a film directed by a woman, and also for a film starring a woman.

7. When in the movie, at the cafeteria salad bar, Bella drops an apple which Edward picks back up and then cradles in his hands, copying the cover image of the Twilight novel. Director Catherine Hardwicke said that took 13 takes to get it right… see photo below..

NINE 3.5**** (almost 4.0****)
Nine” is a knock-out. “Nine” is almost a 10 and is better than “81/2”. “Nine” is one of a kind. “Nine” is like a fine wine. So you ask, what is this “Nine” . Well it is another musical extravaganza from the very talented Rob Marshall who brought us “Chicago..the one where he taught and directed Catherine-Zeta Jones, Renee Zellweger and Richard Gerr to sign and dance. In “Nine” he repeats the phenomena by teaching Daniel Day Lewis and a bevy of beauties to sing and dance..and what a bevy we have: Sophia Loren, Marion Cotillard, Nicole Kidman, Judith Dench, Kate Hudson and Nancy Ferguson.
The story is set during the mid-to late sixties in Italy and the focus is on a famous but fading movie writer-director who is struggling with his 9th movie. The major problem being he has not written the script yet and they are 10 days from starting the movie. All the wonderful actresses play characters with strong connections to him that are primarily revealed in terrific musical production numbers. Let me tell you, these ladies look gorgeous, can sing like all get-out, and Kate Hudson and Fergie can dance up a storm (Kate Hudson’s feisty go-go-type dance number was rehearsed for 6 weeks and took 2 days to shot..but WOW what a number).
I really enjoyed this film. It was a visual feast and an energetic knee-slapper. Rob Marshall is a magician when it come to inspiring non-musical actors/actresses to achieve musical triumphs. He has also become the master of capturing on the screen the verve and excitement of a stage production, which “Nine” was in the 80s..in fact, a Tony Award winner.

I say BRAVO, BRAVO !!!!!

Clark

NOTE: This has a PG-13 rating and is okay for teens on up but is primarily an adult film because of the sexual content ..nothing very overt but an overriding element in the movie.

AVATAR…4.0****
How often do you get to see movie history being made? Not looking back after-the-fact, but as it is actually happening? No ! Not often. I remember when Star Wars first came out in 1977, and I and other people felt a similar way, that we were witnessing something never before seen before that would change movies forever. Well, James Cameron's “Avatar” with it’s long-awaited, much-touted 3D motion-capture technique is just such a giant step into the future of movie making. What we see on screen during “Avatar” has never been seen before and is nearly impossible to explain with words. The advanced motion-forward technique, the exhilarating CGI (computer generated imagery) and the enhanced depth and clarity afforded by the 3D all come together to make a stunningly awesome and truly extraordinary movie. The result is that you become so totally immersed into the film and the action you forget that you’re in a theatre….you enter a whole new, exhilarating fantasy world and you see everything as if it were real.

The story focuses on Jake Sully, a paraplegic U.S. marine, who travels trough space to the Pandora, a planet inhabited by the Na'vi, an alien race, and although they are 9 feet tall and have blue skin and large doe-like eyes, they are still very similar to humans. There he becomes involved with the Avatar project…a process by which his mind and consciousness are transferred to the clone of a Na'vi body. The military on Pandora is interested in mining a very rare and precious rock material and, as luck would have it, there are large quantities of this material in the very place where the Na'vis live. Jake, in Avatar form, goes to live with the Na'vi in order to gather info for the military. While living with them, Jake learns about their culture, their way of life and he starts to see the world trough their eyes. His guide and teacher is the Na'vi Princess, Neytiri. As you might guess, she becomes a romantic interest too. As you watch the movie, you come to care about the characters, especially the Na’vis and the way they respect nature, the animals and above all, life itself, which is a good lesson for all of us to learn and practice. I found myself becoming involved and caught up in the story and characters in a way that I have seldom experienced in many other movies.. it’s an altogether awe inspiring, thrilling, super-visual experience.
“Avatar” represents the wonderful culmination of James Cameron’s greatest moments as a director; bearing the boldness and surprise of 1984’s “Terminator”, the vision and pacing of “Aliens” and the sweeping scope and romance of “Titanic”. And by the way the very gifted James Horner is back for the music and musical score ( he did the wonderful music for “Titanic”).”
Avatar” is one of the best if not THE best film of the year. In fact, it may be one of the most exciting, visually superb films you'll ever feast your eyes. “Avatar” is a movie experience to be savored and remembered, AND you absolutely MUST see this in a theater preferably with 3D and if possible at I-Max 3D.
Clark

TRIVIA NOTES:
1) A full phonetic Na'vi language was created entirely from scratch by linguist Paul Frommer, who was hired by James Cameron to construct a language that was easily pronounceable by the actors, but lacking any resemblance or influence from any single human language. Around 500 words were created.
2) The movie is 40% live action and 60% photo-realistic CGI with a lot of motion capture technology and 3D.
3) With an estimated budget of at least $280,000,000, this is one of the most expensive movies ever made. (For instance, to get an idea of the labor intensive cost of doing the CGI (computer generated imagery), over 800 artist and technicians worked for over 6 months at a location in England solely on that phase of the movie.

INVICTUS…2.5***


There is Hollywood’s way of making movies and then way. Actor/Director Clint Eastwood stamps each of his films with his own imprint. They are straight to the point movies that don’t waste the audience’s time on needless subplots or extraneous events.
there is the Eastwood
The film is about Nelson Mandela and the period of his life after he was released from 27 years in prison. Soon thereafter he was elected President of South Africa and he inherited a very divided racial country. The blacks didn’t trust the whites and vice versa. In order to unite the country Mandela (Morgan Freeman) came up with the idea of using sports, or, one should say, the sport of rugby which was the sport of choice in South Africa. The Springbok rugby team had for years represented South Africa…...at least the “white” South Africans who had ruled South Africa before Mandela as an Apartheid, racially divided country . The team was lead by Francois Pienaar (Matt Damon) and he and his teammates were heavy underdogs to win the 1995 World Cup. Still Mandela thought they could and he enlisted the help of Piernar to inspire the team to greatness.

This is the bare bones of the plot We get glimpses along the way of the country, of Mandela, and of Pienaar and the team…but there are no “getting to know you” scenes. It is either basic to the plot or it is not shown. As long as you can appreciate Mandela’s dream of unity and how he uses the team to achieve that goal then you don’t need to know anything about the sport of rugby. Freeman and Damon are excellent but especially Freeman whose performance is nearly flawless…the role fits him like a glove …he becomes Mandela. He will be in the running for a Best Actor Oscar nomination.

My problem with the movie was that I was not inspired…I watched, I enjoyed, but I was not captivated by the story or the characters. It was almost as if I was watching a well-done documentary on the History Channel. So, to me it was not great but still quite good because it is about great people and great events.

Clark

THE ROAD 3.5***
How to describe this stunning movie. It is as bleak and despairing as any you may ever see which was also true of the book. But, it is ,nonetheless, an inspiring, powerful love story of a father and son. The setting is sometime in the not so distant future following a global disaster of massive proportions…an apocalypse leaving only a few survivors in the world and they are in a horribly desperate place where civilization has deteriorated to the point of complete lawlessness. The "bad" guys are human only in the sense that they still look like humans but they have become mean, vicious marauders who rape and kill without hesitation..initially for the thrill of it and also to steal food, water and other materials. When the food runs out they then capture and kill with their victims becoming the food…yes, cannibalism.

"The Road" is the story of a father and son making the very perilous "road" trip from their former home to where they hope and believe there is a better safer place… somewhere in the southern part of the USA where the other "good" people are supposedly gathering to live in a restored civilization. The trip…the long “road” they follow and only on foot..is so treacherous, so full of danger and menace.. not only are they worn out and exhausted by the journey, those watching the film will be too This is a truly hard film to sit through and endure for the full 1 hr. and 53 min...but if you can endure the darkness, it has its rewards. The father-son love story is moving and powerful, the cinematography is remarkable for presenting such a realistic apocalyptic world and the acting is excellent, especially by Viggo Mortensen, as the lovingly, dedicated father… he will be nominated for an Oscar.

Surprisingly, there is very little violence, no gore, no profanity…there is suspense as you are constantly in fear for the father /son, and foremost an almost overpowering feeling of dread and despair…offset only, but not completely, by the touching, powerful love story.

Only the most sturdy or heart and disposition should attempt this movie…it is the complete..180 degree opposite of a "feel good" movie. In fact, after I saw it I had to go home and watch some several “Three Stooges" episodes on TV to restore myself. BUT, despite its drawbacks, it is an excellent artistic movie.

Clark

NOTE: I have seen “Avatar”… my review coming soon… it is absolutely stunning…a 4**** film. YOU MUST SEE IT IN 3D.

2012 2.0*** (barely)


Believe it or not, “2012” cost 260 million dollars (that’s more than a ¼ of a BiIIion $$) and is 158 minutes long. At roughly 1.65 million dollars a minute, one might at least expect a thrill-a-second work of exciting entertainment. Unfortunately, the many millions spent on this overblown special effects “end of the world” movie are a colossal waste of epic proportions which the movie was meant to be..i.e,. of epic proportions. There is no plot to speak of – primarily it is about Jackson Curtis (John Cusack) learning of the impending end of the world and his trying to rescue his 2 kids and ex-wife ( Amanda Peet) from the disaster. That's about all that happens in the entire movie - for over 2.5 hours! And after you have seen Cusack and his family miraculously escape death, time and again and then time after time once more (whether by earthquake, plane crash, volcanic eruption, tsunami, etc., etc.) the whole thing becomes so wearisome and unbelievable that you almost find yourself rooting for the tsunami to end their desperation just so the movie can end and you can go home. For some, me included, watching this movie was like being hit over the head with a baseball bat multiple times until you eventually are stunned into an abject stupor.

So why are so many people flocking to see this movie…primarily for one reason, the SPECIAL EFFECTS. They are , simply put, amazing. Not credibly, mind you, but dazzling nonetheless. Unlike other disaster pictures, “2012” doesn't just involve a couple of major US locations ( Los Angeles, Yellowstone Park, Washington DC, New York City). It also involves the whole world and we get glimpses of San Paola, Brazil, London and even the Vatican being obliterated (I almost cried when they showed the Sistine Chapel in St Peters collapsing). AND, there are a whole variety of disasters. There are monstrous floods and tsunamis, 10 scale earthquakes, massive ash rain, horrific volcano eruptions... well, you get the idea. It's all very visually dynamic and the variety of it not only left me in awe, but also made me realize I was watching the ultimate disaster film. …the super “popcorn” movie of all time.

So, should you go or not. Yes and no depending upon whether you can completely disengage your brain and fully engage your other non-thinking senses..eyes and ears. Since I knew this going into this movie, I was partially able to enjoy it, especially the special effects. But only partially because my brain refused to be put on hold for 158 minutes. It re-engaged itself for the last 28 minutes and revolted against the near total illogic of the story…when I didn’t leave, there was almost a neurological meltdown. BUT despite this, “2012’ was still a fun, at times exciting, roller-coaster-ride visual experience and I don’t regret having seen it.

If you think you want to see, you MUST see it on the big theatre screen with the surround, multi sound system…you must…otherwise, don’t see it all.

Clark

THE BLIND SIDE 3.5****
This is one of those BIG surprise movies that comes along every now and then. It is basically a medium-to-low budget, independent film where they did everything right and it has turned out to be a BIG audience favorite and a BIG money maker to boot. “The Blind Side” has literally “blind-sided” the traditional Hollywood crowd/producers by taking an “it’s been done before” sports story and successfully turning it into an endearing and inspiring movie that is good for the whole family. In fact, it should have received a PG rating rather than PG-13..there is so little that could be considered offensive , the family value of the film should have prevailed and allowed for a PG result.
The Blind Side" depicts the true story of Michael Oher, a homeless African-American youngster from a broken home, taken in by the Touhys, a well-to-do white family living in Memphis, TN, who help him fulfill his potential. At the same time, Oher's presence in the Touhys' lives leads them to some insightful self-discoveries of their own. As a football player and student, Oher works hard and, with the help of his coaches and adopted family, has the opportunity to make something of himself.
Leigh Ann Tuohy (Sandra Bullock), seems to have the life most women would envy, a wonderful supporting husband(Tim McGraw), and two great kids(Lily Collins and Jae Head). But one day while driving home, she sees, a larger than life teenager whom everybody calls Big Mike (Quinton Aaron). When she tries to talk to him, he comes across as quite shy and withdrawn. When she determines he is homeless, she decides to take him into her well-to-do home with the full support of her family. Michael is a man-boy of few words. This gentle giant brings out the best in other people, especially his new family. He is a teen without an attitude…..a rarity and , as it turns out, the same is true of the Tuohy kids, although they are more all-around-outgoing kids.
The soul of this excellent film is Sandra Bullock . She commands the screen… she is smart, sassy, and strong, Yet she endears herself to you with her touching relationship with Michael, who is authentically played by Quinton Aaron. Aaron is deceptively expressive and strong. Both are well cast and give excellent performances. Country singer, Tim McGraw (who is so believable as Bullock’s husband you may not recognize him) gives a solid performance and he holds his own next to Bullock's fast and feisty Leigh Anne. Jae Head, who plays the Tuohy's son, steals a lot of scenes with his quick wit and enthusiasm. There is also a small but good role for Kathy Bates.
“The Blind Side” will touch your soul and warm your heart…it’s a winner… a fine “feel-good” movie.
Clark

PIRATE RADIO 3.0***(almost 3.5***)
In the summer of 1966, the British Invasion was at its peak. There were the Beatles and the Stones and a host of others. Meanwhile, Motown was also at its peak and a whole new heavy-metal sound was developing in the USA. It was a great time for rock and roll. Unfortunately, the government of the UK didn't quite see it that way, and the BBC stations could only play classical and progressive jazz most of the time.
To meet the public demand for pop music in the UK, pirate stations started broadcasting from boats in international waters just outside of British territorial waters. Thus began a battle between the R&R pirates and Her Majesty's government.. This is a movie about that struggle, focusing on one boat called Radio Rock.
The film stars some of the best comic talent in the British Isles, like Rhys Ifans and Bill Nighy. It features Philip Seymour Hoffman as the token American DJ aboard the Radio Rock ship. It even features Kenneth Brannagh and Emma Thompson ( although you’ll have a hard time recognizing her). The sound track is a non-stop celebration of the hits of 1966 and 1967… a must soundtrack buy for R&R fans.
Although it has a few laughs, and although there is a historical backdrop, the story is not wildly funny or historically accurate. It's more of a fantasy film about rock & roll music. The period covered by story corresponds with my last 2 years in law school when I was dating the cute little blond who was to become my wife. These were some of the best years of my life and the sixties rock & roll music reminds of them and many of my old friends. So I gotta admit that I pretty much loved every minute of this movie and I'm not even going to complain that it went a little too long, because the more than 2 hours flew by for me. This is unabashedly one of the best and most joyful love poems to rock & roll since “Almost Famous”. So I'm going to stop typing with my “Lone Typing Finger”‘ and watch it again in my mind. And I'll sing along. And I’ll remember. And I might even dance…the shag, of course, and rejoice.
Okay you Baby Boomers, rise up and “doo-wop” on down to see this movie and have some fun !!!!
Clark

PRECIOUS 3.5***
The catch-line for this movie is :” Life is hard. Life is short. Life is painful. Life is rich. Life is....Precious”. In a nutshell this catch-line just about sums up this compelling movie and a review could start and end with it. However, that would be too easy and some elaboration, some frosting on the cake will make it sweeter and more interesting.

The story: Clareece "Precious" Jones (Gabby Sidibe) is a rather obese 16-year-old illiterate black girl who lives in Harlem with her welfare-dependent, abusive mother (Mo'Nique). She has a Downs Syndrome daughter and is pregnant with another child, both from being raped by her mother's boyfriend, who is also her father. Her mother repeatedly tells her how stupid and worthless she is while kids taunt her for her obesity. She has become hardened and heartless. But Precious is blessed with an indomitable spirit that refuses to accept the negatives that bombard her. She is sent to an alternative school staffed by a caring teacher and with classmates who, although anything but perfect, possess enough compassion to become supportive friends. How she progresses with school and life and faces other adversities is the rest of the story.

This is one of those rare films that is so well written and directed and so well cast and acted, that you find yourself compelled to see and feel what Precious sees and feels, to walk in her shoes, to experience her pain, her despair, her hopes and her dreams. It will rock you to your bones, bruise your heart and open your eyes and mind ….it’ s an emotional ride and, despite the very dark tone, an uplifting experience. The movie also effectively conveys a Harlem existence that is profane, hard-edged and brutal, but with rays of humanity and compassion that leave room for hope.

Newcomer, Gabourey Sidibe, as Precious, delivers an earth-shattering performance as the sixteen year-old obese girl who suffers from having a mother so abusive, she makes Ike Turner seem like Mr. Brady of "The Brady Bunch". Mo'Nique is flawless the dominant, insufferable mother who makes it her duty to harm, torture and abuse Precious. Mariah Carey also turns in a surprisingly honest and passive performance as Ms Weiss, the understanding Welfare officer who works with Precious.

BRAVO for a truly fine film !!!!

NOTE: The movie has a “R” rating because of the heavy profanity which, for the story, is not inappropriate but still may be offensive to some.

Clark

THE BOX 1.5****


I went into this movie with low expectations and thus was not surprised when I was underwhelmed. The story is poorly written and the film is misdirected or, I should say, missed-being-directed. The movie is like a race horse that starts off strong but by the middle of the race is lagging behind and finally collapses way before the finish line.

Set in Richmond, Virginia in 1976 ( why 1976 I have no idea ) the story involves a couple ( James Marsden and Cameron Diaz) who have a stranger with a severely deformed face ( Frank Langella) mysteriously show up at their home and offer them a tantalizing but awful proposition. He places before them is a box. Inside this box is a button. If they push this button, two things will occur. One, somewhere, someone they don’t know will instantly die. And two, the young couple will receive $1 million in cash..even tax free.. The couple, who currently find themselves in debt, partly because of an extravagant lifestyle, has 24 hours to decide and agonize they do as to whether or not they should push the button and get the money. However, once this initial conundrum is introduced, the story goes from slightly mysterious, to weird, to way-out-there, to what-in-the-heck is going on. I was left confused and frustrated with the ending…and there is no “feel-good” to it.

I enjoy Cameron Diaz but had a big problem with her attempt at a southern accent…for someone who was living in Richmond, it was too heavy and exaggerated and became a distraction. James Marsden is likable but not believable as a potential astronaut. Frank Langella on the other hand, was very creepy and frightening, and more or less ended up carrying much of the movie.

The movie gets bogged down in so much technical and mysterious exposition that you stop caring. And, much of the time Diaz and Marsden look zonked-out by their weighty dilemmas. What a shame that the pacing couldn’t keep up with some good Sci-Fi ideas…as a result, instead of sweeping you along, The Box just sits there like something unclaimed at lost and found. Damaged goods.

Clark

THE MEN WHO STARE AT GOATS 2.0****


George Clooney, Jeff Bridges, Ewan McGregor and Kevin Spacey…a strong cast. So you wonder could this be another “Ocean’s Eleven” or “Three Kings”. Well the answer is a resounding “NO….not even close. Since there’s a lot of desert scenery, it could be called “Sahorrorible Nein”…maybe not that bad but it does involve a lot of wandering around in a desolate script with more mirages than oasis.

So why does it miss the mark..…primarily because of a poor script, ineffective direction and a concept that just doesn’t cut it as a comedy/spoof or a docudrama. At times it veers close to being funny... and then veers off and comes close to satirizing American military tactics... and then veers off in another direction. Too much veering.

The film is based on the book by Jon Ronson who investigated the extraordinary activities of a "psychic unit" within the US army during current Iraq war. Styling themselves as Warrior Monks and Jedi Warriors no nutty scheme was too far-fetched to try out, from killing goats with an intense stare to mesmerizing the enemy with "sparkly eyes"….and even “running through walls”. In the film, McGregor is reporter named Bob Wilton who's hanging around in a Kuwaiti bar trying to get into Iraq to cover the war. There, he meets the charismatic, self-styled former "Jedi Warrior" Lyn Cassady (Clooney) who claims once to have been involved in the top-secret army unit. When Clooney sets off for Iraq on a supposedly hush-hush mission, McGregor tags and gets taken for a ride in every sense.

The story is presented through a series of flashbacks which tell of the origins of the paranormal unit, led by a ponytailed, chilled-out Bridges whose character is disenchanted by the atrocities he experienced in the Vietnam War. So he tries to find a kinder, gentler way of killing people by physic powers. After a reasonably short but robust start, the story quickly crumbles into a series of fragmented skits, patched together by a voice-over narration, generally a sign of last-minute emergency surgery in a movie.

It would have been a whole lot funnier if the goat had won out in the stare down contest.

Clark

PARANORMAL ACTIVITY 3.0 *** generally; 3.5*** for Scary Movie Genre What better time to see a scary movie than on Halloween at midnight. What better way to watch a scary movie than with a theatre full of people who are really ready to be scared. What better movie to make it all happen than, as it turns out, “Paranormal Activity”. AND what a scary, good time it was.

Done with a super-low budget, it pretends to be a true story and is shot entirely inside a modern house in sunny Southern California. Something is bothering a couple. At night, it moves things, stomps up and down hallways, opens and closes doors. Writer/Director Oren Peli understands horror. He knows exactly what effects/tricks can scare the you-know-what out of you…and it’s primarily done through the suddenness of it – not just because the event is scary. The psychology of fright says we can deal with what we can see. It’s what we can’t or don’t see that is frightening. The movie subtly hammers you senseless.
A young couple named Micah and Katie come to believe she is being haunted. In fact, Katie thinks she's been haunted most of her life and Micah is just now being introduced to this scary, troubled side of Katie's life. So, from the beginning, the Director wisely eliminates one element of haunted house movies that usually frustrates the viewer. Most ghost story movies never answer the question – if the house is so haunted, why not just leave the house? In “Paranormal Activity”, it's not the house, it's the girl who’s haunted, and leaving will get them nowhere. So, Katie is haunted by “something.” To prove it and try to figure out what it is and what it wants, Micah sets up a camera which is left on while they try to sleep in their bedroom. The entire film is seen from the perspective of this camera, giving the viewer the impression that they're watching some horrific surveillance video from hell.
I enjoyed the pace as it slowly builds the tension throughout the film and then breaks it with the next even scarier encounter, thus ratcheting up the suspense and terror. I haven't experienced a night at the movies like this in quite a while…it gave me chills and goosebumps, and made the hair on the back of my neck stand-up. Others in the theatre were screaming, laughing, crying and gasping, and there was one guy in the back who every 10 minutes or so cried out for a cigarette.
“Paranormal Activity” is a phenomenal achievement…it’s a really scary movie.
Clark

NOTES: it was filmed in one week for $15,000 and grossed $9.1 million in its first week in the US, breaking the record of highest-grossing weekend ever for a movie playing at less than 200 theaters ( It has grossed as of Nov.1, $84.6 Million dollars !!!!). The director filmed the whole movie in his own home. He got the idea for the movie from a personal experience. Late at night he was sleeping and a box of detergent fell off the shelf. The box was pushed too far back for it to just tilt and fall. AND, guess what….there will be a sequel.

HUMPDAY 2.5*** Generally; 3.0*** for a realistic Indie film.

No, this is not a movie about the slangy workday reference to Wednesday as being the “over-the-hump” day for the workweek.

No, this is, instead, a movie about two straight guys who decide to make a porno film where they are the ones having intercourse with each other.
Do I have your attention now !!!

Two college friends, Andrew and Ben, get together years after college. Ben has settled down and is happily married to Anna. Andrew is single and somewhat wild. During a drunken night with other revelers goading them on, Andrew and Ben brazenly agree that they'll make an “art” film of themselves “doing it” for entry in the Seattle “Humpfest” film festival. The next day after they’ve sobered up, each hopes the other will back out of the idea, and they warily circle each other in the days that follow right up until the planned “event” still looking for a way out. Ben, in particular, smarts against Andrew's condescending attitude about the “white-picket-fence” life in which Ben and Anna live. Andrew, on the other hand, resents Ben’s implication that Andrew is nothing but a rolling tumbleweed, a life without a purpose. How do things work out? Do they go through with it. What about Anna, the wife. Well, I'm not going to tell you.
This film is surprisingly perceptive about male relationships/friendships, and what makes this even more surprising is that it comes from female screenwriter/director Lynn Shelton.
Most people will feel uncomfortable watching this movie (I surely did), but, as it turns out, that is the whole point. We are uncomfortable because the characters are very uncomfortable. And It's hard to watch people struggle with difficult situations like this, but it is how they work it out that makes it all worthwhile.
Obviously, this movie is not intended for the easily offended. Or, in fact, for most audiences. But, it is a rare experience…. an Indie reality movie that is both interesting and a whole lot weird. "Humpday" is rated R and features strong sexual language and frank sex talk, simulated sex (both straight and gay) with some nudity, and other derogatory language.
This is fairly strong stuff and not for the weak at heart or for high brows.
Clark

SURROGATES 2.0*** This is one of those movies with a very interesting concept…what if humans could purchase your own idealized life-like, version of a robot..i.e. a ‘surrogate” through which you could live and experience life vicariously. In simplest term, "surrogates" are physical robots that do not have robot minds , they are run by actual human beings ("operators") via a remote control technology. The operators sit in a dental-type chair and wear mental caps to control their surrogates. The idea is to allow the operators to enjoy and experience all the sights, sounds and sensations without being placed in physical risk . In this story 98% of humans have surrogates and they are so common they are sold in stores, such as Wal-Mart or Target, as any other consumer item (clothes, for example) and they come in a wide range of quality from the crudest model that look like mannequins to some that look just like real human beings. Some owners have just one model that are visual replicas of themselves. while others (the rich, obviously) may have a dozen surrogates all of different shapes and sizes as they have cars. It’s a world populated with beautiful, gorgeous surrogates who look just like humans…I would have loved to have been the Casting Director for this film. An interesting, even fascinating concept. But, as is often the case, the concept gets lost in a far too complicated, convoluted story. Too bad…”it coulda been a contender”.

Bruce Willis stars as both the older human FBI Agent and his younger, glamorized surrogate. He and his female partner are investigating the murder ( the first murder in many years) of two people whose deaths occurred simultaneously with the destruction of their surrogate bodies which is NOT supposed to happen. This leads to a plot involving a mysterious new weapon and a mad genius intent on mass murder. Meanwhile Willis' character re-discovers what it means to be human when his surrogate is destroyed and he’s not allowed to get a replacement. The likely suspects are in a special segregated enclave within the city where humans who are anti-surrogates live and it is off-limits for surrogates.


While this one one is an interesting movie, it is not really worth the today’s cost of a movie theatre ticket, but it might be worth the cost of a rental IF you like soft SCI-FI and Bruce Willis.

Clark

WHIP IT 3.5****



You could call this “Juno” on roller skates. The same terrific Ellen Page stars here as a 17 yr. old small town, going-no-where teenager who happens upon ladies roller derby in the Big town of Austin. On a lark, she tries out for one of the teams and finds out that she’s good at it and that it is good for her. The movie also reminds me of “The Wrestler” from the standpoint of presenting a fascinating look at one of those out-in-right-field sports and especially its focus on the roller girls…the “derbettes”…and their camaraderie, their less-than-dainty-uniforms and tactics, their wild makeup and hairdos, AND their preoccupation with coming up with gruesome names such as “Mayhem”, “Smashly”, “Bloody”, and the one Page adopts for herself.. “Ruthless”. It is only semi-serious and half-way realistic… but it is all-the-way funny and heartfelt.

“Whip-It” is produced and directed by none-other than Drew Barrymore who also plays a supporting role as the team toughie and wild one, “Smashly’. It was wise of her to not try to overshadow Page and an excellent supporting cast. Barrymore hits a homeroom on all counts and does an amazing job for her rookie turn as a director.

I enjoyed this movie from start to finish …the characters are fascinating, realistic and endearing…the story is well written… unique in some ways but familiar in others (written in fact, by a real roller “derbette”).Hats off and a “well done” to Drew Barrymore for enthusing the excellent ensemble cast and to Ellen Page for taking on a very physical role and pulling it off in a very believable way.

If you have been looking for something different, something unique, but at the same time a “feel good” movie, this is it.

Clark

ZOMBIELAND 3.5*** overall/ 4.0**** for its genre


Zombieland is a gleefully twisted mockumentary about a world full of you-know-whats, wherein only five living people remain in the entire world. It’s gory and disgusting, but most of all, it’s terrific fun, with just the right mix of violence and off-kilter comedy.

It has one of the most unique and hilarious openings in memory. There is nothing subtle about it. You are dropped right into Zombieland as Columbus (Jesse Eisenberg) begins listing the rules to survival. Of course each rule gives you a hysterical example of why the rule is in place. Columbus is funny enough with his phobias and geek lifestyle that proves to be what keeps him alive but it isn't until he meets Tallahassee (Woody Harrelson), that things really kick into gear. Harrelson was been born for this role. He has more one liners than any character in recent memory. Things get even more interesting when Columbus and Tallahassee come upon sisters Wichita (Emma Stone) and Little Rock (Abigail Breslin) {NOTE: Each of the characters is called by the name of the city they’re from. The girls are an important part of the chemistry of Zombieland and they hold their own by outwitting the guys a couple of times and killing their share of zombies.

The biggest moment of the film has to be the mystery cameo. I'm glad I didn't know who it was and I won't spoil it for anyone else. I will say that it was brilliantly written into the script. PERFECT!

As you would expect, there’s lots of blood splattering, plenty of gore, frequent of cursing, but not so much with the “f-word”, and even some nudity. But not too much for a zombie/horror movie especially where the emphasis is on the comedy and the parody. If anything, Zombieland is a movie that dares you to take it seriously, just so it can pull the rug out from under you and we can all laugh This one is so good it deserves to take its place amongst the best of the genre, such as 'Shaun of the Dead'
.
Everyone rates movies differently but I rate a movie on how much I enjoyed the film and with that being said, Zombieland, for its genre, gets 4 out of 4*** ……. an overall rating a 3.5****.

Clark

THE INFORMANT ! 2.5*** (almost 3.0***) This is an offbeat movie with a serious subject but done with an overall comic touch. The subject is very contemporary…corporate greed on a huge scale both internally, exorbitant salaries and bonuses, as well as internationally, massive illegal price-fixing by international companies on a far-reaching global scale.

Matt Damon stars in the movie…in fact he is the movie. As Mark Whitacre, an ambitious, fast rising executive with ADM , the internationally corrupt company, he is the exact opposite of his Bourne character. At times he reminds me of the George Costanza character in the Seinfeld TV series. Damon put on about 35 lbs for the role, wears an awful looking hairpiece and does a great job of pulling of the demure but cagey character.

At a point in the story, the FBI commences an investigation of ADM, and Damon is the focus point. As the story moves along, it becomes a baffling mystery as to whether Damon is the puppet or the puppeteer..the victim or the villain.

There is a lot of voice over where Damon is revealing his thoughts, remembrances and observations…narrated but not spoken. This is where the persistent humor and comic overtones come into play both from Damon’s spoken and unspoken thoughts and his actions. At times its hilarious and at all times its captivatingly puzzling.

Another quirky aspect of the film is the musical score….it has a jazzy ’70s vibe by Marvin Hamlisch (side-note: he’s one of the few people to win an Emmy, a Grammy, an Oscar, a Tony, a Golden Globe and a Pulitzer Prize) who brings a retro hipness to the already wacky and fun film.

An interesting and funny film…good but not great although Damon is close to great.

Clark

ADAM 3.0*** ( nearly 3.5***)



This is a charmingly challenging “romantic” drama. Yes, it’s a “boy meets girl’ and they both are attracted to each other, and what seems like a “romance” develops although, as it turns out, it can, at best, only be, a “relationship” because the “boy’ , Adam, though 29 years old, not only lacks social skills, he is incapable of experiencing or showing real feelings…of caring for or truly loving anyone. You ask why ?? Well, Adam (Hugh Dancy) has Asperger’s, a mild form of autism. Although Adam is terrifically intelligent he often seems dense because he can’t process information like the rest of us. He cannot read people’s faces or emotions. Allegory, metaphor, irony, sarcasm and most forms of humor are beyond his comprehension, as are feelings. Adam can function in an obsessive compulsive way and has a job making the electronic components for toys.

The “girl’, Beth ( Rose Byrne), who moves into his apartment and gets to know him learns fairly early on that he has Asperger’s… he tells her…and then she reads up on it. Despite this knowledge she begins to have feelings for him that he can’t have for her. It is amazing and a credit to Beth that she is willing to be with a guy who is never going to fit in, who will never be able to “read” her and who will eternally be ill at ease with emotions. He finds a comfort with her and comes to “need” her, and the need grows as the relationship deepens. But, will the relationship last, can it last… can they make a serious go of it ???? This dilemma…this paradox makes for a fascinating story that is presented with honesty and without the usual “Hollywood” trappings or manipulations.

The performances are superb, especially that of Dancy ,as Adam, who is dead-on near perfect with how he capture the heart-breaking reality of someone who has Asperger’s . He also imbues his character with an unshakeable dignity and moral resolve. But Byrne, as Beth, is also wonderful as the wanna-be-girlfriend, one who wants to experience all the love and emotion that should come with it…yet she knows that it can never really happen.

This movie will educate you, will pull on your heart strings and will ultimately inspire hope and understanding. Such is a rare experience and, as is often the case, usually only found with courageous Independent films which this is. BRAVO for the Indies !!!!!

Clark

INGLORIOUS BASTERDS 3.0***


Inglorious Basterds (IB) makes no apologies, asks no forgiveness… it's a no holds barred assault on the senses. The director, Quinton Tarantino, doesn't care if he offends… he’s a master of cranking up tension and suddenly mixing it with laugh out loud moments. It’s not for everyone and if you’re not a fan of Tarantino’s style, this may not be for you.
"Inglorious Basterds is a "The Dirty Dozen" meets “Pulp Fiction” and partly tells the story of a small band of about 10 Jewish-American guerrilla soldiers who are dropped behind enemy lines in German-occupied France with one purpose in mind… to kill as many Nazis as often and as brutally as possible so as to strike fear and terror in the hears of Hitler's military. Led by Lt. Aldo Raine (Brad Pitt), the group accomplishes this by raids in which many German soldiers are killed and scalped ( Lt. Raine is part Cherokee) and allowed survivors have swastikas carved into their foreheads. There are really only a few scenes of such carnage. Instead the story revolves mostly around an SS Colonel, Hans "The Jew-Hunter" Landa (Christoph Waltz) and a French Jew, Soshanna Dreyfus (Mélanie Laurent)), whose family was brutally murdered in 1941 by Landa. Four years later she owns a movie house in Paris and meets a Lt. Frederick Zolle , a young German war hero who is smitten by her and persuades Nazi Minister of Propaganda, Josef Goebbels, to hold the premier of the film about his war exploits at her movie house. What a terrifically tempting target the premier audience will be as almost all the most important Nazi Generals and Officials will be there.

Since the real heart of this movie lies in Shosanna and for purposes of realism, about 80% of the dialogue in this movie is subtitled… from French and German. But it all plays out quite well and I don’t fault but, in fact applaud, the use of the subtitles. Also, despite this being a QT film, it has less-than-the-expected number of brutal moments, and they're so sudden, so few and so far between, you’ll find them all the more dramatic…but they are violent, graphic and bloody.
The acting in this film is superb ….. with his thick Tennessee accent, Brad Pitt is gut-bustingly hilarious as Aldo Raine Mélanie Laurent, a French actress, is exceptional as Shosanna . However, the real show-stealer here is Christoph Waltz, a German actor, as Colonel Hans Landa. On top of being able to act well in several different languages, he manages to do what almost every great, classic villain manages to do, and that is to accomplish being both charming and menacing at once. He should, without question, get a Best Supporting Actor Oscar Nomination for his performance.

Clark

CORALINE 3.0***…almost 3.5*** (a DVD rental or cable movie)


To begin with, this is a 2009 movie that superbly employs stop action animation with some computer generated effects. Also, it is a film adapted from a book that won the 2002 Bram Stoker Award for Best Work for Young Readers. Even so, it is not a movie for very young children ( under 10 years old). It is a dark fantasy… a gothic fairy tale with creepy images and a sometimes spooky look. But, for age appropriate kids and adults, it is very, very good in a very, very different way. And for those who look for the pearl in the oyster, it is a surprisingly fine family film because it focuses on what family is all about and points out the danger of strangers, especially those who try to lure kids with nice things.
The Story: Coraline is a young girl, 8 to 9 years old, but wise beyond her age, who has just moved into an old house with her parents, who can best be described as workaholics. She left behind good friends and new ones are very hard to find , While Coraline doesn't really dislike her parents, she feels neglected and disconnected from them. Coraline, in her search for something to do…for some excitement in her otherwise boring life, finds a secret door in the house which leads to a different world—an alternate universe. Coraline goes through the door and discovers her "other" mother and father. They look exactly like her real parents except they have buttons for eyes. Coraline is seduced by all the wonderful things the new parents have to offer. She's treated to sumptuous meals and given a tour of a garden outside the house which is full of fantastic creatures which Coraline finds enchanting. As you watch this unfold, you get that bad feeling that it is TOO good to be true … that evil may lurk in that strange alternate world. So, tension builds as you worry about whether Coraline will see what may be behind those button eyes…and be able to resist the lure of the parent “strangers”? And the answer …well, that’s for you to find out.

The best way to describe the over-riding theme of this fine film is right up there in the movie poster…”Be careful what you wish for.”

Clark

500 DAYS OF SUMMER….3.5****




The film can be pretty much summed up in one of the first lines of the film. "This is a story of boy meets girl. But you should know up front, this is not a love story." 500 Days of Summer is not your typical romantic film. There's something to it.. Maybe it's the style. Maybe it's the realism. Maybe it's the wonderful music? Maybe its the beautiful cinematography? Maybe, its Tom and Summer...

Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Zooey Deschanel are the leads, Tom and Summer. These are real everyday people. Tom, a believer in true love. Summer, a doubter. Tom falls in love with Summer from the start. She doesn't. Tom is like every guy, and every guy has known a girl like Summer. The girl they want, but can't have. They try, to no avail. It's frustrating, and Tom is frustrated. He's happy then sad. He doesn't know what to think. Gordon-Levitt and Deschanel have great chemistry together and give solid performances. You really believe their relationship and hardships. It makes you notice the little things in relationships. The film also highlights two young stars on the rise.

The story is not in chronological order as its jumps back and forth from different days as Tom remembers his life and relationship with Summer. When remembering he, as we, may not remember every detail in the in exact order in which it occurred. We choose what we want to remember. That may be the good, or bad. For Tom, it's a lot of both . The film shows the good and the bad of love, of relationships, and life. There's something about it that sets it apart from the usual romantic comedy.

Gordon-Levitt and Deschanel are perfect in this movie. He is tossed around both emotionally and physically, from extreme highs to terrible lows, and if you don't cheer for him, then you have no heart. She owns the screen, and everything about her makes it easy to see why a guy would spend (500) days pining for this woman.
Clark

THE HURT LOCKER 3.5*** ( almost 4.0*** and, yes 4*** for a War Movie) What a strange movie title . Whatever does it mean. Well for this movie it can mean 2 things…..generally, a soldier’s slang for a real bad place or perhaps more specifically for this movie, a small locker where the Explosive Ordinance Disposal expert, Sgt. James, keeps souvenirs from the bombs and IEDs ( “Improvised Explosive Devises”) that he has disarmed….that could have “hurt” him or more likely blown him to smithereens.

This is a frighteningly, up-close look at the terror of the Iraq war especially through the eyes of this elite bomb disposal squad. The movie puts you in the “boots” of these 3 soldiers and you slowly and methodically experience the near-death walk they must take daily …the fear… that never-ending-in-your-bones fear of dying at any moment . They must not only try to survive the disarming of the bombs and IEDs but the constant danger of being a target for a sniper… they don’t know who is a friend and who is a foe.

This is a very well made war movie that tackles a very difficult subject head on . There is a constant, almost unbearable tension whenever the EOD squad is in action…you literally hold your breath waiting for the sniper’s bullet or the bomb explosion. Amazingly, this near masterpiece of suspense and unrelenting intensity is the excellent work of Director, Kathryn Bigelow. She nails it by deploring an excellent cast of unknowns headed up by Jeremy Renner, the bomb specialist, and Anthony Mackie, as Sgt. Sanborn and Brian Geraghty, as Specialist Eldridge, as his cover men for snipers….she and creates a gritty, beyond realistic contemporary war story… the best since “Saving Private Ryan”.

When it’s over, you wonder how these young brave soldiers do it over therein Iraq or Afghanistan..or wherever…how can they go out there in harm’s way day after day never knowing but constantly fearing that it will be their last day. Such courage..such overwhelming courage..well we owe them SO much yet they get SO little credit. There are many reasons to see this film....certainly because it is an excellent, well done and well acted film…but also because it is one that everyone should see so you too can truly appreciate and revere the contributions and sacrifices that these young men are making for ..all of us…they deserve our praise and out prayers.

Clark

THE TIME TRAVELER’S WIFE 3.0 *** It is not often that I have read the book before seeing the movie. This is one of those times. I loved the book… an excellent blend of an intriguing Sci-Fi concept with a dramatic love story. So how was the movie ?? There are many, many readers of the best-selling novel who will compare the two, as did I. Well, I thought the book was better although I liked the movie too. The reason for favoring the book…when you’re reading a story with such a fascinating concept as time traveling overlaid with a sweet love story, a free ranging mind-generated imagination has less restraints and more freedom to explore the story and, thus the feelings. Trying to achieve this through the visual/audio of a film is quite difficult, if not impossible. So it comes down to a difference in the artistic mediums of how to present the story and each has its own strengths and weaknesses. The movie does strive mightily to capture the feel of the book and comes close. It is a beautiful film with excellent performances…you quickly become involved with the characters, their love, their dilemma and you feel their joy, their pain and especially their love.

The story is about a twisty, time-bending romance of Henry (Eric Bana ) a Chicago librarian, and Clare (Rachel McAdams) an artist. Clare is six years old the first time she meets Henry, although he is 30something. And Henry is in his mid20s the first time he meets Clare, when she’s around 20. This weirdness of this is because Henry is an unintended time traveler: he suffers from a genetic aberration that causes him to become displaced in time, at random moments, and he has no control over it. He melts away, leaving his clothes behind, and journeys back to moments in his own past, or ahead to moments in his own future. Henry and Clare fall in love, but that’s not so unusual. People fall in and out of love every day. No, what makes this one unique is Henry’s predicament and Clare’s unwavering willingness to accept it. Her husband is frequently floating through time like a ghost unsure of where – or when – he’ll end up while she goes on with her linear life patiently hoping someday his odd condition can be cured and come to an end.

The early stages of their adult relationship are particularly stunning and more so on the screen... each step, a testing of feelings and commitment as they come to love each other .There is an ease to the pair, a familiarity that is smooth and intoxicating. It is almost like watching two old friends waltz their way to the type of lasting love we like to dream everyone gets to experience…and then celebrating in the happiness of seeing them achieve it ... while, at the same time, being troubled by our concerns about Henry’s unpredictable condition.

You can enjoy “The Time Traveler's Wife” for what it is: an endearing love story with an unusual sci-fi premise. It may not be exactly like the book but even so, the premise of the story and the excellent performances by the leads make this movie well-worth the “travel”….and even after the “travel is over, you will find your imagination continuing to linger.

Clark

DISTRICT 9 3.5 *** for general film category but 4.0*** for a Sci-Fi film. “District 9” is a fantastic, gritty, realistic science fiction movie that goes way beyond your typical ”lot of action and no story’” Sci-Fi film. Not since "Blade Runner”, “Star Wars” or "Alien" have we seen a Sci-Fi film with such a unique vision and presentation.

The movie abandons the usual Hollywood sci-fi setting and places us in the harsh slums of South Africa ( much like “Slumdog Millionaire”) Then we are given an stunningly original screenplay which takes risks in the way it tells its story. Finally, there is no overused, overexposed celebrity in sight to detract from the exhilarating plot. And, the “stars” of the show, the aliens are brilliantly created trough the magic of computer generation (CGI), and done so well done, you actually believe them to be real.

District 9 takes place in an alternate timeline where, twenty years ago, an alien spaceship came to a halt above the City of Johannesburg, South Africa (remember “Apartheid”). The aliens( thousands of them ..this is a monstrously huge spaceship) are unable to operate the ship anymore, so they are taken off by an international police force and segregated in their own ghetto-slum..called District 9.. on the outskirts of the city. Eventually, the international government calls for a resettlement of the aliens (nicknamed "prawns" due to their appearance) and this is where the story gets complicated…but I dare not tell you anymore as it is better to walk into District 9 knowing as little as possible. I will say that the movie/story achieves an incredible balancing act. It is blends science fiction and political drama flawlessly, fusing them together with a lot of in your face action and violence.




The best thing about District 9 is that it always manages to stay fresh and surprising throughout . It starts off as a mockumentary in order to establish the background for the storyline. The film gradually crosses over to being a more conventional film, although still having a very documentary feel…using news interviews and TV footage. You don't really notice these changes in style the because you're so wrapped up in the ingenious story.

“District 9” has so much to like and literally is a sight to behold. It's spectacular, darkly funny, entertaining and thoughtful all at the same time. For Sci-Fi fans, it is a MUST see and for others it is an excellent adventure…a lot of action, some violence but no real gore…it does have an “R” rating but this is not a hard “R”.

Clark


NOTE: All the shack used in District 9 for the alien ghetto/slum were actual shacks that existed in a section of Johannesburg which were to be evacuated and the residents moved to better government housing, paralleling the events in the film. Also paralleling, the residents had not actually been moved out before filming began. The only shack that was created solely for filming was Christopher Johnson's shack.

JULIE AND JULIA 3.5*** (almost 4***) As you’ll learn from this delightful movie, you can never have too much butter for cooking, and also you can never have too much of Meryl Streep and Amy Adams. “J & J” is based on two best-selling memoirs, one from famous cook and chef, Julia Child, and the other by Julie Powell, a woman whose life was greatly affected by Child's cookbook. Director and screen writer Nora Ephron handles the material well, blending the two narratives, the two different time periods and locations, and the comedy and drama into a delicious tale of a deliriously cheery woman and a typical, practical city girl who are liberated and empowered by cooking.

In 1949 France, American Julia Child (Streep) settles in with her diplomat husband Paul (Stanley Tucci) to a new environment and tries to sort out what she wants to do with her time. After determining that she has an uncanny love of food (shopping for groceries is as much fun to her as other women find buying a new dress), she takes up schooling in French cooking, eventually teaches a few students, and then for 8 years works on her enormous French cookbook.

In 2002, Julie Powell is adapting to a new apartment in Queens, N.Y. with her writer husband Eric (Chris Messina) and her depressing job as a government agency secretary. Her spare time is devoted to food. When her day job starts to really wear away at her soul, she sets a unique goal for herself: to prepare every recipe in Julia Child's cookbook - 524 recipes in 365 days. Along the way she must deal with the strain on the relationship with her husband, a lobster killing ordeal, and, for her, the dreaded, formidable task of boning a duck.


Streep is marvelous as Julia….her transformation into the character is nothing short of brilliant...a masterful performance that is so multi-layered and natural that it’s easy to forget that Streep is not the chef herself. Her voice is perfect, her characterizations are absolutely stunning, and the spirit she brings to the character shines forth as lovable and endearing. Amy Adams is, as well, terrific in a simpler, plainer way. She is one of Hollywood's truly great up-and-coming actresses (and one of my favorites). Adams embodies Powell with an almost heartbreaking beauty that surrounds a fragile vulnerability...so, as she struggles with her project, you want to just give her a great big ole' hug. Streep and Adams blend together to become the perfect recipe for a delicious and delightful feast of heart, humor and wondrous storytelling. It is easily one of the best movies in 2009, a crème de la crème.

Bon Appétit !!!

Clark

TRIVIA NOTE: Consider this, Meryl Streep has been nominated 15 times for an Oscar and has won 6 times. It’s interesting to note that her first movie in 1977 was “Julia”, her first nomination was in 1978 for “The Deer Hunter”, her first Oscar for Best Supporting Actress was in 1979 for “Kramer vs. Kramer” and her first Oscar for Best Actress was in 1982 for “Sophie’s Choice”. Since her cinematic debut in 1977, and during the past 32 years, she has never gone more than five years without an Oscar nomination. She also holds the record for the most Golden Globes nominations with 23, and along with Angela Lansbury and Jack Nicholson, holds the record for the most Golden Globe wins with 6.

Well, I finally came down to earth again, and I mean literally when on Saturday I got down and dirty and sweaty doing some heavy yard work at home…so much for being a movie star..that ego got pruned and mowed right down. AND back to my movie reviewing: .
G.I. JOE THE RISE OF COBRA 2.5***(but barely) Anyone who’s seen one or both of the Transformers movies may think they know what to expect from” G.I. JOE ”So it may come as something as a surprise to say that “GI Joe” may be more enjoyable than the last “Transformer” movie, which, in truth, isn’t saying a lot.. “G.I. Joe” is purely and simply an action fantasy aimed squarely at kids and anyone who remembers playing soldiers in their back yard.
Based on the adventures of American toy ranger GI Joe, the film focuses on an elite, secret military unit led by General Hawk (Dennis Quaid) whose goal is to rid the world of all terrorists, enemies and general bad guys. (GIJOE is an acronym for the Global Integrated Joint Operating Entity). When top US soldiers Duke (Channing Tatum) and Ripcord (Marlon Wayans) are recruited into the unit, they team up with the likes of Breaker and Scarlett (Rachel Nicols) to take down the evil MARS corporation, headed by megalomaniac McCullen The Joes come up against enemies like Storm Shadow and Zartan, and the situation is complicated by the fact that, before she turned to a life of international crime, the deadly Ana (Sienna Miller) used to be Duke’s lady love.
But, let’s not get carried away. “G.I. Joe” is first and foremost an action movie with bombastic effects and exciting sequences and larger-than-life characters who only need to fit into their environment; there’s no need for a back story or character development when all you have to do is fight like a ninja and look damn good doing it. Which is fairly lucky for Channing Tatum since, although he certainly looks the part, he has the emotional range of one of those plastic Hasbro figures. “G.I. Joe” does not pretend to be high art or even a memorable movie; it’s purely conceived for commercial entertainment with its jaw-dropping gadgets and fairly good CGI. If you’re looking for a good, quality film, go and see something else. If you’re looking for a fun movie for kids, of all ages, you may just enjoy this non-thinking, action outing with the “Joes”
Clark

Well I’m back home in Raleigh even though I left a small part of my “Hollywood heart” in Milwaukee. My feet are not entirely back on the ground yet…I’m still floating from those 3 days of movie making magic. Movie: "NO GOD, NO MASTER"
FIRST DAY ON SET (Friday)
How to begin. On Friday I walked on the perimeter of the set for the first time and lo and behold before me sitting in those classic Hollywood set chairs were none other than 2 of the stars of the movie…David Strathairn and Sam Witwer. I thought I had died and gone to movie heaven. And that was just the beginning. Also on set that afternoon was the lead actress Mariano Klaveno who is doing her first movie ( she has a prominent role recently on “True Blood”, the HBO vampire series as a vampire who is the “maker” of Bill, the lead vampire). She’s a lovely young actress whom I chatted with that day. I told her she looked lovely, especially without the vampire teeth…she chuckled.
They were filming on a street next to the beautifully renovated Milwaukee Town Hall during the afternoon then moved inside for 2 courtroom scenes, one of which I was in as a non-speaking lawyer extra. I sat immediately behind the Sacco and Vanzetti characters. Let me tell you , Alessandro Mario, who plays Vanzetti, is a genuine Italian from south of Sicily . He a very popular Italian TV star but this is his first American movie. And he is hot and intense. You ladies are going to like this guy. Sacco is played by James Madio, an Italian/American actor who you’ll recognize from some movies but especially from the HBO series, “Band of Brothers”. I chatted with both of them and they were nice and charming.
Also, during a break between the 2 courtroom scenes being filmed, we were introduced to David Strathairn and Sam Witwer and had a chance for pictures and chatting. I spoke briefly to Witwer but spent some fascinating time chatting with Strathairn. Mainly we talked about the book I had just read, “Julie and Julia” which is coming out as a movie this weekend. I mentioned that he was referred to in the book by Julie as an actor she had a crush on before she got married…that she had even cooked him a cake to try to get his attention…then after she was married and doing the Julia Child cooking thing, she sent him cookies when he was performing again in NYC. Well, Strathairn did not know that he was in the book and said he’d have to read the book….that was very interesting.
To finish the first day/night on the set, I was a non-speaking lawyer-extra for the big courtroom scene where Sacco and Vanzetti give their final statements before being sentenced. I will be in the scene as I am sitting on the first row behind S & V.
SECOND DAY ON SET (Saturday)
On the next day they starting filming around 1 PM and went until 11 Pm. It included several Wall Street scenes with an explosion, old 20’s style cars (gorgeous preserved authentic cars), and all 4 of the lead male actors. I met and talked with Witwer’s best friends, his Godson and his Dad, who is also a lawyer. I went to supper with everyone…it was catered in a nearby Church and everyone..ALL cast, crew, extras and visitors go together and eat together for the meals…good food.
THIRD DAY ON SET ( MONDAY)
My last day on set was Monday. It started around 1 PM and went to 1:15 AM…these people really work hard. By the way the last take of the day/night is call “the martini” ..I don’t know why, but it is kinda neat. The location was at the old Pabst Brewery Co site which shut down in the 90s when the company moved its operations to California. The filming included another bomb explosion of a boy on a bicycle and then several night scenes with Strathairn, Witwer and Mario.
GENERAL COMMENTS/OBSERVATIONS
I was given as much free reign on the set as is possible because I was a ‘VIP” investor guest. I was savvy enough to learn quickly so by the second day on set I knew where to be and not be and how to blend in with the crew. My only distinguishing item was my UNC Tar Heel hat that I wore proudly and also for protection from the sun.
This was truly a unique experience due to the friendly attitude of everyone and the fact that they treated their VIPs so very well. The Director’s wife, Anna Marie, and her assistants, Janice and Gayla, were super hostesses and did all they could to make the visit truly memorable. However, I don’t think they had met anyone quite as enthusiastic and in love with movies as I. They could tell that I was in movie heaven and loving EVERY minute of it.
I talked with cast and crew ( from the Director, Terry Green, right down to the assistant to the assistant) as well as the extras and family and friends of the cast, crew and extras, and the other VIP guests.
The shooting of the movie will continue until around August 15-20…all in and about Milwaukee. Then it goes to musical and sound enhancement, other fine tuning and editing. It should be “in the can” by late fall for presentation to film festivals such as Montreal and Sun Dance..even the Berlin festival and hopefully will be in the theatres by mid 2010.
As you can tell this was a dream come true for me and exceeded my greatest expectations by a country mile. My sweet wife, Sara, was uniquely understanding and wise in her decision to let me go do this on my own so I could flit around to my heart’s content without a care in the world. That’s why I love her so.
Well, I could go on and on, and if I have rambled too long it’s because I can’t contain the joy of the experience and wanted to share it with you while it was still so fresh and vivid. At some point I’ll have pictures to share but I must first get clearance and it may not come until the picture is out. I do hope to have at least a couple of pictures of me in my 1920’s suit and tie with buck shoes for my “scene”…I think I look rather dapper.
I’ll keep you posted on the progress of the film.

Clark

:

LATE BREAKING BULLETIN

An update on my forthcoming trip to Milwaukee to see firsthand the shooting of exterior scenes of a movie that I am a very small investor in. I will be sort of a “VIP’ guest on the sets to view the actual magic of movie making .The movie is a small independent film, “No God, No Master” and will star David Strathairn.
I also indicated that there was a small chance I could be chosen as an extra for the film….WELL the small chance has become a reality. I’ve been chosen to be an extra and do a non-speaking part of a lawyer in the courtroom scenes …I think I’ll just be sitting at a table as one of 2 or 3 lawyers involved in the trial of Sacco and Vanzetti. I’m thrilled not only for having a “role” but also for being able to observe the interior filming of these scenes…especially in a staged-up version of a courtroom.. The movie takes place in the 1920s, so they’ll have me dressed up in appropriate wardrobe …I don’t know about make-up…depends on how close I’ll be to the camera. It happens on Friday, July 31.
On Saturday and Monday ( Aug 1 & 3) I’ll be a guest on 4 to 6 exterior set/scenes as an observer. All of this is in Milwaukee where “Public Enemies” was also filmed.
I’ll be taking notes and will give a report when I return.

A DREAM COMES TRUE
Well, something I’ve always dreamed of is going to happen and I’m thrilled. Toward the end of this month or the first week in August, I’ll be going to Milwaukee to see firsthand the shooting of some of the exterior scenes of a movie that I am a very small investor in….but, nonetheless a “co-producer” in the most general sense.
I will be a “VIP’ on the set to view the actual magic of movie making and there is a small chance I could be chosen as an extra for the film. I plan to be there 2 to 3 days and, needless to say, I am very excited about the whole thing.
The movie is “No God, No Master” and will star David Strathairn…more info on the film and the star are set forth below:
I’ll take notes and give a report when I get back
Clark
****************************************************
NO GOD, NO MASTER Films In Milwaukee This Summer: A news release
Strata Productions, Inc, in association with Sacco & Vanzetti, LLC and NGNM, Inc. is gearing up for production this summer on the feature film No God, No Master starring Academy and Golden Globe Nominee David Strathairn.

No God, No Master is the story of U.S. Bureau of Investigation agent William Flynn, who is swept into the world of homegrown terrorism during the Red Scare of the early 1920’s. His journey into the culture of anarchism sets the stage for a timely drama with resounding parallels to the politics and issues of contemporary society. This action-driven feature film is the story of one man’s odyssey into a universe of power, greed, and corruption, forcing him to confront the very principles and values that make him an American. The event that came to spark the “trial of the century” started off as a rather uneventful robbery/murder in the small town of Braintree, Mass. on April 15, 1920. Three weeks later two Italian immigrants, Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti were charged with the crimes. The case exploded onto the national scene due to the defendants’ being anarchists and the fact that antiracial and anti-immigrant hysteria was sweeping the country.
Milwaukee, Wisconsin has been a first choice location for Chicago Writer/Director Terry Green since the inception of the script. The city’s rich history, vintage architecture and Lake Michigan’s horizon are the perfect backdrops for the 1919 period locations, which simulate old world New York City. The anticipated start date for filming is July 20th.

MOON 3.0*** (almost 3.5***) What a nice surprise to stumble upon a riveting, independent, Sci-Fi film that ,for a change, doesn’t have any aliens or razzle-dazzle space travel and battles. Instead, we have a story with a single focus that manages to capture major emotional themes very successfully.

“Moon” is seemingly a one-man show featuring Sam Rockwell as astronaut, Sam Bell, who was sent to the moon alone on a three-year contract to maintain a mining station that harvests the sun's fusion energy from moon rocks.. With only two weeks left of his three year contract, Sam can't wait to return to Earth to reunite with his wife and almost 3 yr. old daughter whom he has never seen in real life. But the mind-numbing isolation and utter lack of human contact has already taken its toll on Sam and bizarre visions and troubled dreams disrupt him and the efficiency of his work. Strange occurrences with the communications system and somewhat unusual behavior from his computer companion GERTY (voiced by Kevin Spacey) make Sam more uneasy. GERTY is far more user-friendly than was “2001’s’ HAL 9000 Instead of manifesting as a baleful red eye like HAL, GERTY shows up literally with a yellow smiley face on his screen that occasionally turns into a frowny face or even a cryey face…it’s the faces we’ve all become familiar with. But it works and is one of many examples of the filmmakers´ ability to make a virtue out of a low budget film.

After a perilous accident with one of the excavation units, he awakens to find that he may no longer be alone in the mining facility…also quite unexpected things are happening and he begins to make a series of discoveries that change his understanding of his job, his life, the universe and everything.

“Moon” explores the very heart of science-fiction through worthy themes, many of which are plausible in the future while managing to stay away from the more outlandish subjects. There are no aliens or heavily armed spaceships, no time travel, warp drive, black holes, or wizened green men who tutor in ancient sorcerer's ways. Instead, the ideas of isolation, loneliness, the value of human life, productivity, artificial intelligence, and cold corporate business practices are examined. In other words No Star Child. No ultimate trip. No jive-talking robots. Just good old-fashioned sci-fi story-telling.

NOTE: Inexplicably this movie was given an “R” rating…the only possible reason would be because it had a couple of “F” words…there is no violence, no sex and no horror…. compared to so many others with far worse that got a “PG-12”, this is NOT an “R” movie.

THE BOY IN THE STRIPED PAJAMAS (2008-a rental) 3.0***
This is not just another Holocaust movie…no, its much different from any you’ve ever seen. What makes it so unique and fascinating, and ultimately heartbreaking is the viewers perspective as to what’s happening. You see the evil horrors of Hitler’s “final solution” for the Jews unfold through the innocent, even naïve, eyes of a German boy, Bruno, who is the 8 yr. old son of the Commandant of Auschwitz-Birkenau . The father has been newly assigned to the extermination camp and moves his wife, 12 yr. old daughter and Bruno from Berlin to what appears to be an idealic country estate in a remote part of Poland. The family is purposely not told anything about the nearby camp…but in time the wife and daughter figure it out…but Bruno is never told and never really figures it out… to him it is a fairy-tale, sanitized farm-like camp with fences and where everyone wears striped pajamas.

What adds to the delusion is how beautiful the story is filmed…how it captures the lush green of the countryside and the easy life of the family…which is in stark contrast to the evils that are occurring at the nearby death camp. The only hint of the evil in progress is the occasional black smoke coming from the tall smokestacks and the tiny flakes of ash falling from the sky.

There may be more dramatic and philosophical movies dealing with this ultra-tragic subject, but few deal with the horror of the "final solution" with such clear and childlike simplicity. But, be forewarned…this is a hard, tragic movie that will take an emotional toll on you and your emotions…and you won’t see it coming… you’ll be stunned with shock and disbelief. You’ll feel a heavy sadness not only because of the story but also from being reminded of the incomprehension of the enormity of the death of six million Jews… and that’s something we should never forget… as the old adage says : "Those who refuse to learn from history are doomed to repeat it."

Clark

WHATEVER WORKS 3.0***(almost 3.5***) “Whatever Works” works and works quite well chiefly because Larry David knows how to play Woody Allen better than Woody does. Now Woody is still in charge as the Writer and Director and wisely returns to his roots, his best stomping ground..NYC's Manhattan.

The story is smart and quirky, a return to the best of the Woody Allen. The main character, Boris (Larry David, is a near genius who is a total skeptic and complete pessimist. By chance, he takes in a young 20 yr. old run-away, Melinda St. Ann Celestine (Evan Rachel Wood)...I LOVE that name; and despite being complete opposites, a sweet relationship grows out of it. Melinda is from the back woods of Louisiana with a sweet drawly Southern accent, who was a teen beauty queen including Miss Tupelo, Miss. She almost believes everything Boris says even when its clear that he's being sarcastic. David and Wood play well off each other and the startling contrast in their characters' age, intelligence and character works well ...it turns out to be charming and funny.

Then throw in the staggered arrivals of Melinda’s parents looking for their lost daughter. First is her mother, played by the excellent Patricia Clarkson, who soon sheds her Louisiana backwoods and becomes a swinging bohemian artist . Next comes Melinda's dad, played by Ed Begley, who soon has a sexual revelation that helps him understand why when he played high school football he always got a real charge out of seeing the hunky tight end go into a crouch position.

It's a laugh-out-loud movie with just the right mix of odd but likable characters and has sparkling right-on dialogue.

So, "whatever works” to get you to this movie, do it and do it quickly because, being an Indie movie, it may not be around very long.

PUBLIC ENEMIES 2.5***(almost 3***) The 1920s/30s was an exciting time for gangsters like Al Capone, Baby-face Nelson, Pretty Boy Floyd, and of course John Dillinger. These criminals were more famous than celebrities and lived like kings, if only for a short while. This was also the time of the birth of the FBI through J. Edgar Hoover, and the police weren't afraid to use brutal tactics to punish lawbreakers. So brutal that gangsters like Dillinger were revered as heroes to the public, like Robin Hood…. although while they robbed from the rich (the Banks)…they did NOT give any of it to the poor..

Director Michael Mann (Heat, Miami Vice) does this time period well and focuses on the most famous bank robber, John Dillinger (Johnny Depp), and the FBI agent charged with hunting him, Melvin Purvis (Christian Bale). “Public Enemies” is not a great gangster movie but it's not bad either. Johnny Depp is once again brilliant in his portrayal of Dillinger, and it also helps that he looks spookily similar to the man. Mann chose not to make this yet another romantic legend of Dillinger, but instead it's almost a documentary focusing on showing what the famous robber was really like..He wasn't just a peoples' hero, he was also a very cunning thief and a cold blooded killer.
Mann, by focusing on the facts and not the legend, had to sacrifice good character development and script. Almost all the other characters and their relationships in the movie seem thin because there aren’t enough scenes to show who they were. The main relationship is the romantic one between Dillinger and his girlfriend Billy (Marion Cotillard… the French actress who won the Best Actress Academy Award in 2007 for her role as Édith Piaf in "La Vie en Rose").She plays the lovely local Chicago girl trying to hold on to her values…she fights off the temptation for as long as she can, but Dillinger is that one man who was able to make her feel needed in a way no other man had. Cotillard is the kind of actress you like to see in romantic movies.
Surprisingly, this is not a fast paced movie so adrenalin junkies may need to adjust a little. It is a smart movie…a very stylized movie suited for most ages provided you can live with the violence. It is not blood gushing, but there is plenty of violence.
Clark

AWAY WE GO 3.0***



“Away We Go” is Sam Mendes' warmest film to date. This one takes on a tone of humor and lightness that none of his other works approached (“American Beauty” and “Revolutionary Road”). Burt (The Office's John Krasinsky) and Verona (SNL's Maya Rudolph) are a young thirtyish couple expecting their first child. They live in a ramshackle trailer in Colorado near where Burt's parents (Jeff Daniels and Catherine O' Hara) live. But they decide to leave when his parents decide to move to Belgium for a couple years, despite hearing the news of their forthcoming grandchild. The couple embarks on a journey to reunite with family and old friends and to see where is the best place to raise their unborn daughter. These are people they think could help them jumpstart their new life … people they already know or think they know. This is a fascinating tale about two nice, caring people who love each other but have no ties to anywhere With each stop in the journey, through each encounter, they are surprised by what and whom they find…some of the encounters are sad, some outrageous, some funny…but they all serve to deepen their relationship.

There is some great chemistry between Krasinsky and Rudolph . He has a goofy charm but he also makes Burt a loveably doting and comforting boyfriend for Verona, no matter what. And Rudolph is a big surprise here as she turns in a performance of maturity, vulnerability, and depth. And then there is the rest of the cast which is outstanding… the aforementioned Daniels and O' Hara…plus, among others, Jim Gaffigan and Allison Janney; Josh Hamilton and Maggie Gyllenhaal; Paul Schneider… all of whom provide the sizzle for vignettes that play out in the stops along the way..

The direction is solid and the writing is sharp, funny and thought-provoking . It's got an infectious vibe to it, and while it may ride the Juno/Little Miss Sunshine/ wave a little too much, it still is a pleasurable and effective indie rom-com. You'll enjoy going along with Verona and Burt on their journey, and after the last surprise stop, you'll leave with a smile on your face, feeling like you're glad you got to know them.

Clark

Pink Panthe 2..2.0***

A follow-up on “My Sisters Keeper”…I had not read the very popular book before seeing the movie but have talked to some who have. I have learned that the movie has a very different ending from the book and while a few bookers are okay with the change, apparently many of the book’s more loyal fans are rather upset. I won’t say what the change is as that would be a spoiler…but this is a heads-up to let you know and be prepared.



PINK PANTHER 2 2.0 ***( a rental) Steve Martin returns as the incompetent and bumbling Inspector Closeau…. stumbling and tumbling his way through beautiful locales as he tries to recover the stolen-again Pink Panther diamond. Let's get straight to the point, Martin is NOT Peter Sellers, and never will be, but his impression will put smiles on your face provided you are a Steve Martin fan which I am….but if you’re not, forget about it. Martin gives a funny performance with hilarious and sometimes overdone slapstick routines.. He is the movie although supporting actors deserve mention, too. Jean Reno and Emily Mortimer return as Closeau's best friend and love interest and provide some comedic support.

In addition to the Pink Panther diamond, other valuable, priceless artifacts are being stolen by a master thief called The Tornado. The Shroud of Turin along with the Pope’s papal ring are among the valuables that have been so brazenly stolen. Enter The Dream Team, comprised of the best detectives from around the world, including Clouseau. The team chases The Tornado through Europe, while Clouseau bungles every attempt to get close.

The is humor in this film consists of pratfalls, cake-in-the-face, numerous chases and Clouseau”s misuse of lanuage. In-between, you ho-hum and wait for the action to start up again. Some clever bits are Clouseau’s Smart car, trying to get a wine bottle in a restaurant, visiting the Pope, and Clouseau’s regular meetings with Lily Tomlin on proper behavior and diplomacy.

All in all, “Pink Panther 2” comes in a little better than I thought it would but not that great..not nearly comparable to the Peter Sellers’ Pink Panther movies.

NOTE: This is no longer in the theatres, so you’ll have to rent it or find it on cable.

Clark

"My Sister's Keeper" 3.0***

MY SISTER”S KEEPER 3.0*** This is a deeply moving story that will stir your heart and cause the tears to flow. While it is definitely a “tear jerker”, it is much more than that. And all that it is will have a profound effect on most people…of sadness, of course, but even more so of the power and wonder of love…love of family and friends and love of life… every precious minute of it. I cried during this fine emotional film as well as on the way home…and, you know, I have found that a good cry is often as good for you and your well-being as a good laugh.

This movie is adapted by director Nick Cassavetes from Jodi Picoult's bestselling novel of the same name. As with his previous films (including the “The Notebook”), Cassavetes allows this latest work to speak plainly, relating the story of a young girl, Anna Fitzgerald (Abigail Breslin), whose parents (Cameron Diaz and Jason Patric) created her specifically so they would have “spare parts” (bone marrow, kidney, etc.) to help prolong the life of their cancer-stricken daughter Kate (Sofia Vassilieva). After 11 years of this sacrifice, Anna finally objects to her second-class status and sues her parents for “medical emancipation”.

Watching it unfold, I was quite moved -- not by mere pity, or by the simple device of pitting one young woman's life and happiness against another's -- but, rather by the portrait of a family that loves each other as best they can, of people trying to do small, good things in the face of big, bad things like death. And “My Sister's Keeper” isn't shy about the medical reality of the situation -- here we see Kate wracked by pain, bleeding at times, suffering from the side-effects of chemo and scared and shivering. But we also see Kate laugh, and love; we see her deal with her sister’s desire to be freed from the painful, risky medical procedures and operations. We see her prepare for death and try to prepare those whom she loves. Simply put,” My Sister's Keeper” is not shy about how much pain there is in the world -- how much random agony and wasteful death there is. But it also isn't shy about how much love there is in the world, as well -- how simple kindness, graciousness, sympathy and true simple love abounds all around us.
The cast is all strong. Breslin is that rare child actor who doesn't seem plastic or too-sweet precious when she plays wise beyond her years. Vassilieva tackles some tough stuff and does a remarkable job; Diaz is more engaging, and more engaged, than she's been on-screen in a long time. And the supporting cast is great; Jason Patric plays Diaz's husband/father with a flinty, quiet strength; Joan Cusack is the presiding judge who always seems human; Alec Baldwin is the lawyer Breslin hires.
There are many memorable moments but the scene at the beach with the blue sky on a windy, sunny day with the ocean swirling as it begins to turn towards darkness was special. I wasn't just thinking about how those things were beautifully shot (which they were) but also about how they were simply beautiful. “My Sister's Keeper” doesn't pull any punches, and it doesn't tell any lies, and it earns every feeling and thought and memory it brings to the audience….and in today’s cynical world, that's not such a bad thing to have.
So, I urge you go if you can handle the emotional nature of the story and for you ladies (and maybe a few of the guys) take several Kleenex or perhaps a couple of big paper towels..you will need them.

Clark

"The Proposal" 3.5***

THE PROPOSAL 3.5*** I’ve just seen this movie and wanted to do the review while I was still in the “feel good” mood generated by this movie. Sometimes everything comes together with a movie…a well-written story, just right direction, a right-on musical score, great film locations and, of course, actors performing at the top of their game. …when this happens, it’s a magical experience and a rare one at that. Such is the case here which is even more surprising when you take into account their gamble in taking a well-worn story premise that has been done dozens of times, and then actually succeed in making it fresh and delightful.

The Premise: Margaret Tate (A wonderful Sandra Bullock) is a very successful, hard driving “Devil Wears Prada” type executive and Andrew Paxton ( a superb Ryan Reynolds) is her put-upon, do-anything-for-her Admin Asst. She is Canadian and is about to be deported when she makes a deal with Andrew. He agrees to marry her so she can stay in NYC provided she gives him a job promotion and goes to Alaska with him to meet his family. They really don’t like each other… really…and, besides, this is supposed to be just a business deal …but then ????. But, enough about the story and what happens…the rest you must see for yourself.

I must confess I kept waiting for this movie to crash and burn, and there were so many opportunities, but to my surprise and delight it did not…rather it continued to get better. Credit goes to the entire cast, crew and the excellent director, Anne Fletcher. But special recognition is due Sandra Bullock for a masterful performance…you really must pay careful attention to her non-verbal acting..her facial expressions, her body language..she can and does it all. Then there is Ryan Reynolds who has quickly become one of my favorites (“Definitely, Maybe”; “Just Friends” and “Van Wilder”)…and there is no one… simply NO one who could have played this role as well as he does…he absolutely nails it. Last, but not least is the “Golden Girl’ Betty White, as Andrew’s grandmother, who steals every scene she’s in..she’s the consummate master of her craft..especially in a role made for her extraordinary talents.

I thoroughly enjoyed this movie and highly recommend it . it’s a great date movie for young and old…in fact, it’s a great movie for one and all. A “must see” especially if you like “feel good” movies.
Clark

Anvil ! The Story of Anvil 3.0***

ANVIL ! THE STORY OF ANVIL 3.0*** This documentary of Anvil (a Canadian heavy metal band) begins with testimonials from members of some of the biggest hard rock/ heavy metal bands of all time; from Guns n' Roses to Metallica. They are all united in their praise for Anvil, one group which served as an inspiration to each of them in the early 80s. Anvil shared the stage with Jon Bon Jovi and Whitesnake, and appeared to be destined to be just as successful as their peers. But it simply never happened.

It is hilarious, heartbreaking, touching, puzzling, and suspenseful. It's been called the "real life Spinal Tap," and these metal heads surely do walk the fine line between genius and stupid, but it's got so much more heart and humanity than just that. “Anvil” is about the unstoppable creative urge and the do-it-yourself-or-die-trying spirit. Lips and Robb, the two fiftysomething never-say-never- rockers at the heart of the film, are fascinating, lovable characters, half heroes, half fools, partly delusional, yet partly triumphant too. Lips and Robb have been playing music together since they were 14 and have kept Anvil ticking along, supporting themselves with menial jobs and persisting despite the exasperation of their friends and loved ones. They're good at what they do, they know it and love it and can't stop doing it, even though the music industry passed them over a long, long time ago. They caught all the bad breaks they possibly could, but they didn't let that stop them. This isn't a film about rock n roll, or about these two guys -- it really about all of us, our fears and dreams, our successes and failures, our shining moments and our stupid ones.
This certainly isn't your standard from rags to riches Hollywood melodrama…more of from rags to rags to rags etc…. but it's really fluid and well done. It doesn't matter if you have never heard of Anvil ( I had not), or the bands they inspired or even like the music (I have never been a fan of hard rock/heavy metal music, at all) – yet, this documentary makes it easy to be gripped and captivated by their story.
NOTE: This has been a limited release film and will be hard to find in any theatres…so wait for the DVD release or cable TV play time.
Clark